Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

A boundary constraint energy balance criterion for small volume deformation

  • W. W. Gerberich
  • , M. J. Cordill
  • , W. M. Mook
  • , N. R. Moody
  • , C. R. Perrey
  • , C. B. Carter
  • , R. Mukherjee
  • , S. L. Girshick

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

21 Scopus citations

Abstract

A concept for the deformation resistance of small volumes under contact subjected to displacements in the 2-100 nm regime is proposed. In terms of an energy balance criterion, the external work minus stored elastic energy is consumed by surface energy and plastic energy absorption. The surface energy is interpreted in terms of new area of contact or new area created by slip step emergence or oxide film fracture. The plastic energy absorption is interpreted in terms of dislocation work. As such, this is analogous to a contact mechanics Griffith criterion for the hardness or flow strength of crystalline metals, semiconductors or oxides. Derivations of supporting loads and stresses provided for nanoindenter tips, nanospheres, nanocubes and thin-walled nanoboxes are presented. For comparison, measured hardness and flow strengths of Al, Au, Fe-3%Si, Ti, W and Si nanostructures are reported in the 2-100 nm length scale regime. It is proposed that Si and Ti nanospheres experience a minimum in contact resistance as dictated by a balance in surface energy dominance at small contact and dislocation hardening dominance at large contact. The variation of a strength controlling coefficient, α, with material suggests a length scale dependence on shear and/or pressure activation volumes. © 2005 Acta Materialia Inc. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)2215-2229
Number of pages15
JournalActa Materialia
Volume53
Issue number8
DOIs
StatePublished - May 1 2005
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'A boundary constraint energy balance criterion for small volume deformation'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this