Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

A comparison of the radiation response of TaO<inf>x</inf> and TiO <inf>2</inf> memristors

  • David R. Hughart
  • , Andrew J. Lohn
  • , Patrick R. Mickel
  • , Scott M. Dalton
  • , Paul E. Dodd
  • , Marty R. Shaneyfelt
  • , Antoinette I. Silva
  • , Edward Bielejec
  • , Gyorgy Vizkelethy
  • , Michael T. Marshall
  • , Michael L. McLain
  • , Matthew J. Marinella

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

46 Scopus citations

Abstract

The effects of radiation on memristors created using tantalum oxide and titanium oxide are compared. Both technologies show changes in resistance when exposed to 800 keV Ta ion irradiation at fluences above 1010cm -2. TaOx memristors show a gradual reduction in resistance at high fluences whereas TiO2 memristors show gradual increases in resistance with inconsistent decreases. After irradiation TaOx devices remain fully functional and can even recover resistance with repeated switching. TiO2 devices are more variable and exhibit significant increases and decreases in resistance when switching after irradiation. Irradiation with 28 MeV Si ions causes both technologies to switch from the off-state to the on-state when ionizing doses on the order of 60 Mrad(Si) or greater (as calculated by SRIM) are reached without applying current or voltage to the part. Irradiation with 10 keV X-rays up to doses of 18 Mrad(Si) in a single step show little effect on either technology. TaOx and TiO2 memristors both show high tolerance for displacement damage and ionization damage and are promising candidates for future radiation-hardened non-volatile memory applications. © 2013 IEEE.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)4512-4519
Number of pages8
JournalIEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science
Volume60
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2013
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'A comparison of the radiation response of TaO<inf>x</inf> and TiO <inf>2</inf> memristors'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this