Abstract
In the original paper,1 the authors erroneously took the wrong figure from the cited paper2 to generate Figure 8a. The figure was intended to compare acoustic excitation to magnetic excitation in liquid and illustrate that magnetic excitation resulted in a more Lorentzian peak shape with a well-defined frequency and quality factor that shifted when the tip-sample contact stiffness was varied (as opposed to the original version, which mistakenly showed acoustic excitation data for both the first and second eigenmodes). The new figure and caption for Figure 8 are shown below. (Figure Presented).
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 8331 |
| Number of pages | 1 |
| Journal | Macromolecules |
| Volume | 51 |
| Issue number | 20 |
| DOIs |
|
| State | Published - Oct 23 2018 |
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Correction to: Contact resonance force microscopy for viscoelastic property measurements: From fundamentals to state-of-the-art applications (Macromolecules (2018) 51:18 (6977-6996) DOI: 10.1021/acs.macromol.8b01178)'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver