Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Reply to: Comment on “Machine learning enhanced analysis of EBSD data for texture representation”

Research output: Contribution to journalLetterpeer-review

Abstract

We respond to Schaeben et al.’s1 comment on our paper, “Machine Learning Enhanced Analysis of EBSD Data for Texture Representation.” While their observations are factually correct, they do not disprove our results. Our method, TACS, preserves the full distribution of crystallographic orientations and is validated with real-world data. We emphasize the importance of empirical validation over theoretical constructs in assessing machine learning methods’ practical performance.
Original languageEnglish
Article number73
Journalnpj Computational Materials
Volume11
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 2025
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Reply to: Comment on “Machine learning enhanced analysis of EBSD data for texture representation”'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this