Reply to Comment on Metal-insulator transition in random superconducting networks

We address the remarks of Domriaanguez, Lapez, and Simonin [Phys. Rev. B 42, 8665 (1990); preceding paper] on the determination of the normal-to-superconducting (N-S) phase boundary in random superconducting networks. We refute their claims that the disappearance of the fine structure of the N-S boundary and the change of the critical exponent k for the slope of the critical field on (p-pc) are due to the introduction of very weak links between nodes in the superconducting networks. © 1990 The American Physical Society.