Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Secondary fluorescence correction formulae for X-ray microanalysis - I parallel-sided thin foil, wedge, and bulk specimens

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

6 Scopus citations

Abstract

Secondary fluorescence correction formulae have been derived for specimen geometries that are commonly employed in the analytical electron microscope. Formulae have been derived for parallel-sided thin foil and bulk (electron probe microanalysis) specimens, for which established correction formulae currently exist, and for wedge-shaped specimens, for which no formulae have been available to date. All derivations explicitly account for the absorption of fluoresced X-rays leaving the specimen en route to the spectrometer, which the existing correction formulae neglected wholly or in part. It is shown that the existing secondary fluorescence correction formula of Nockolds et al. for parallel-sided thin foils, which entirely neglects the absorption of secondary X-rays, is sufficiently accurate as long as the 'sec α' factor is omitted. An additional factor (y/(x + y) in Reed's notation) should be appended to the existing secondary fluorescence correction formula for bulk specimens in the electron probe microanalyzer to account for near- surface absorption of fluoresced X-rays, which was neglected by Castaing. The difference in the secondary fluorescence corrections calculated with the φ(ρz) dependencies of Lenard (exponential and Packwood and Brown (modified Gaussian) is shown to be negligible.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)77-94
Number of pages18
JournalUltramicroscopy
Volume68
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 15 1997
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Secondary fluorescence correction formulae for X-ray microanalysis - I parallel-sided thin foil, wedge, and bulk specimens'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this